The Fed Cuts and Projects More Easing to Come

2025-09-17T15:15:58-05:00

After a monetary policy pause that began at the start of 2025, the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy committee (FOMC) voted to reduce the short-term federal funds rate by 25 basis points at the conclusion of its September meeting. This move decreased the target federal funds rate to an upper rate of 4.25%. Economically, the cut is justified given signs of a softening labor market and moderate inflation readings. However, Chair Powell characterized today’s easing as a “risk management cut,” rather than one driven by fundamental changes in the economic outlook. NAHB is forecasting another 75 basis points of easing in the coming quarters, with 25 of that total coming before the end of the calendar year. The Fed announced no changes to its ongoing balance sheet reduction policy. While the Fed is easing on the short-end of the yield curve, the ongoing quantitative tightening (QT) program is still exerting upward pressure on mortgage interest rates and is partially responsible for the elevated spread of mortgage rates over the 10-year Treasury rate. The Fed’s balance sheet has contracted from almost $9 trillion in May 2022 to $6.6 trillion in September. A hypothetical slowing of QT for mortgage-backed securities would reduce mortgage interest rates, perhaps by 25 basis points. The Fed summarized current economic conditions as follows: “Recent indicators suggest that growth of economic activity moderated in the first half of the year. Job gains have slowed, and the unemployment rate has edged up but remains low. Inflation has moved up and remains somewhat elevated.” The FOMC statement also indicated that uncertainty about the outlook remains “elevated.” Given the size of recent employment revisions, it might be worth noting that both the outlook and some of the current data reporting is uncertain. Chair Powell noted in his press conference that activity in the housing market remains “weak,” consistent with recent data for the home building sector. He also noted that “housing was at the center monetary policy.” Powell once again noted that a housing shortage exists that lies beyond monetary policy, alluding to the challenges builders face from issues like regulatory cost burdens. The September FOMC policy decision was expected by markets, given recent communication from the Fed, including Chair Powell’s remarks at the Jackson Hole monetary policy conference. For this reason, much of the effect of today’s decision was already priced into long-term interest rates, including a decline for the average of the 30-year fixed rate mortgage. This rate has declined by 20 basis points to 6.35% over the last month, per Freddie Mac. In fact, the 10-year Treasury rate barely moved in response to today’s announcement. A growing risk for long-term rates, including mortgage rates, comes from federal government debt and deficits. In contrast to movement for long-term rates, the reduction of the federal funds rate will have a direct, beneficial effect on interest rates for acquisition, development and construction loans, the key financing channel for private builders who build more than 60% of single-family homes. This will reduce lending costs for builders across the nation and enable more attainable supply. There was considerably more internal drama entering today’s FOMC decision. Besides marking a resumption of Fed easing, today’s meeting featured newly installed Fed Governor Stephen Miran and the participation of embattled Governor Lisa Cook. It is worth noting that Miran was the only dissenter at today’s meeting. Instead of voting for a 25-basis point cut, Miran preferred a 50-basis point reduction. That said, today’s decision featured less division among the FOMC voting members than some analysts expected, which is a positive with respect to the Fed’s independence. A revised Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) was also published today. The SEP provides a view of Fed Governors’ and Federal Reserve Bank Presidents’ outlook for economic conditions, inflation expectations and future monetary policy actions (only 12 of the 19 SEP respondents are voting members at each meeting). While there was little dissension in today’s FOMC policy decision, the SEP reveals considerable disagreement for the outlook. Seven SEP respondents projected no additional cuts for the remainder of the year. Twelve projected more cuts. The median projection suggests two more rate cuts for 2025. One respondent, most likely Governor Miran, provided an outlook of five more 25 basis point cuts before the end of 2025. On a median basis, the Fed sees weaker economic growth ahead. The SEP reports a 1.6% GDP growth rate (measuring the 4th quarter to 4th quarter change) for 2025, 1.8% in 2026 and 1.9% in 2027. The SEP projection reports only small increase in the unemployment rate, with a peak rate ahead of 4.5% ahead. For the median SEP respondent, the economy is not seen as reaching the target 2% core CPE inflation rate until 2028. It is worth noting that prior editions of the SEP also saw this target as effectively two years away. Nonetheless, while taking longer than previously expected, the otherwise declining trend for expected inflation in the years ahead suggests the Fed sees any possible tariff effects on inflation will be one-off or otherwise limited, as Governor Waller in particular has explained. Overall, today’s decision was widely expected. Much of the benefit of today’s easing was already priced into long-term interest rates, but the rate cut will benefit business loan finance conditions. Further, additional rate cuts lie ahead, although as Chair Powell noted, “policy is not on a pre-set course.” Future Fed actions will depend on incoming data and the evolving policy environment. Discover more from Eye On Housing Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

The Fed Cuts and Projects More Easing to Come2025-09-17T15:15:58-05:00

Fed Remains on Pause Again

2025-07-30T14:15:54-05:00

At the conclusion of its July meeting, the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy committee once again held the federal funds rate constant at a top rate of 4.5%. However, two members of the committee dissented from the decision (Fed Board Governors Waller and Bowman), the largest number of dissenting votes since 1993. Moreover, some economic data – including a slowing housing market – are pointing to a need to resume normalizing the federal funds rate from its current, restrictive stance. In particular, Chair Powell noted in his press conference that the “housing market remains weak” and policy is “modestly restrictive.” NAHB is forecasting two rate reductions before the end of the year, including one at the next Fed meeting in September. President Trump has made it clear that he believes the central bank needs to cut again. All that said, except for the presence of dissenting votes in today’s decision, the Fed’s statement did not appear to be more dovish than those of prior months, which is indicative that the Fed remains data dependent. While the Fed pointed to moderating growth, including a soft first quarter, “elevated uncertainty” about the outlook continues to be cited by the central bank. It is the case that evolving tariff policy, and trade negotiations in general, represent an uncertainty risk (although some, like Governor Waller, argue that tariff effects will represent a one-time effect on prices, not a source of ongoing inflation). However, the combination of a quick move for cuts at the end of 2024 and the subsequent long, ongoing pause in 2025 is itself a source of uncertainty, particularly for businesses in sectors like residential construction whose financing costs are tied to short-term lending rates controlled by the Federal Reserve. The continued decline for service sector inflation points to moderating overall inflation, which when combined with softening job openings data and growing specifics about trade policy, provides justification for a resumption of continued monetary policy easing. While a reduction in the federal funds rate would help the supply-side of the housing market via builder financing costs, long-term rates like mortgage interest rates are determined by investors and the bond market, not the Fed. So, while the economy would benefit from a resumption of monetary policy easing, impactful reductions for long-term interest rates depends on declines for inflation expectations, improvement of the government’s deficit outlook, and gains for productivity for the economy. Discover more from Eye On Housing Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Fed Remains on Pause Again2025-07-30T14:15:54-05:00

The Fed Pause Continues

2025-06-18T15:17:06-05:00

Reflecting most forecasters’ expectations for the June FOMC meeting, the Federal Reserve continued its post-2024 pause for federal funds rate cuts, retaining a target rate of 4.5% to 4.25%. The pause comes after a 100 basis point series of reductions in late 2024. Despite these cuts, mortgage rates have remained in the high 6% range. The Fed also held unchanged its ongoing quantitative tightening program, which is more strongly focused on balance sheet reduction for mortgage-backed securities (MBS). The Fed reaffirmed its policy commitment to achieve maximum employment and reduce inflation to a two percent target rate. During the 2025 policy pause, the Fed remains data dependent in a “wait and see” mode for developments in areas like tariff policy. Chair Powell noted that we learn more about tariffs later this summer. NAHB’s forecast incorporates two rate cuts from the Fed for 2025, one in the third quarter and one in the fourth quarter. The Fed noted that economic activity continues at a “solid pace,” however swings in imports affected the first quarter GDP data. The central bank also stated that the unemployment rate remains low and inflation remains “somewhat elevated.” I would note that the primary driver of this elevated inflation is ongoing high rates of shelter inflation, which reflect significant, underlying increases for residential construction costs for the post-covid period. During his press conference, Chair Powell cited that the housing market suffers from both long-run and short-run issues, involving affordability and a [structural] housing shortage. In prior comments to Congress, Powell has noted that home builders face a perfect storm of challenges from both the demand- and supply-sides of the market. The Federal Reserve also published an update for its Summary of Economic Projections (SEP). Compared to its prior March projections, the Fed reduced its 2025 GDP forecast from 1.7% to 1.4% (year-over-year rate from the fourth quarter). During his press conference, Chair Powell linked policy uncertainty as a complicating factor for economic growth. Additionally in the SEP, the Fed slightly increased its 2025 forecast for the unemployment rate in the fourth quarter from 4.4% to 4.5%. The central bank also increased its core PCE inflation projection for the final quarter of the year from 2.8% to 3.1%. During his press conference, Chair Powell noted that economic forecasters cited tariff policy as a contributing factor for a higher than expected level of inflation for 2025. He specifically projected that a measurable amount of inflation will arrive to the economy this summer. There is some debate among economists whether tariffs would have just a one-time impact on the aggregate price level, which would not be inflation pressure felt over a sustained period of time, or would in fact be a factor increasing inflation as a series of price increases. Looking forward to future monetary policy, the “dot plot” projections of the SEP leave the Fed forecasting two rate cuts in 2025, followed by just one reduction in 2026 and one more cut in 2027. This projection removes one rate cute from both 2026 and 2027 compared to the March dot plot, although the Fed continues to point to 3% as the long-run, terminal rate for the federal funds rate. Discover more from Eye On Housing Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

The Fed Pause Continues2025-06-18T15:17:06-05:00

About My Work

Phasellus non ante ac dui sagittis volutpat. Curabitur a quam nisl. Nam est elit, congue et quam id, laoreet consequat erat. Aenean porta placerat efficitur. Vestibulum et dictum massa, ac finibus turpis.

Recent Works

Recent Posts