The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) on Oct. 30 issued a rare negative determination regarding countervailing and anti-dumping duties on imports of aluminum extrusions from China, Colombia, Ecuador, India, Indonesia, Italy, Malaysia, Mexico, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and Vietnam.
The New York State Builders Association (NYSBA) recently released a study assessing the feasibility and cost of installing automated fire suppression systems, or fire sprinklers, in new 1- and 2-unit homes in the state.
Home price growth continued to slow in August, growing at a rate just above 4% year-over-year. The S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller Home Price Index (seasonally adjusted – SA) posted a 4.24% annual gain, down from a 4.82% increase in July. Similarly, the Federal Housing Finance Agency Home Price Index (SA) rose 4.25%, down from 4.72% in July. Both indexes experienced a sixth consecutive year-over-year deceleration in August. The year-over-year rate peaked in February 2024 when the S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller stood at 6.57% and the FHFA at 7.28%. By Metro Area In addition to tracking national home price changes, the S&P CoreLogic Index (SA) also reports home price indexes across major metro areas. Compared to last year, all 20 metro areas reported a home price increase. There were 12 metro areas that grew more than the national rate of 4.24%. The highest annual rate was New York at 8.07%, followed by Las Vegas and Chicago both with rates of 7.22%. The smallest home price growth over the year was seen by Denver at 0.68%, followed by Portland at 0.82%, and Dallas at 1.57%. By Census Division Monthly, the FHFA Home Price Index (SA) publishes not only national data but also data by census division. All divisions saw an annual increase of over 2% in August. The highest rate for August was 6.31% in the East South Central1 division, while the lowest was 2.36% in the West South Central division. As shown in graph below, all divisions saw a slow in rates compared to June. The FHFA Home Price Index releases their metro and state data on a quarterly basis, which NAHB analyzed in a previous post. See Census Divisions by state here: us_regdiv.pdf Discover more from Eye On Housing Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Personal income increased by 0.3% in September, following a 0.2% up in August and a 0.3% increase in July, according to the most recent data release from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. The gains in personal income were largely driven by increases in wages, salaries, and personal current transfer receipts. However, the pace of personal income growth slowed from a peak monthly gain of 1.4% seen in January 2024. Real disposable income, income remaining after adjusted for taxes and inflation, inched up 0.1% in September. On a year-over-year basis, real (inflation adjusted) disposable income rose 3.1%. The pace of real personal income growth softened from a 6.5% year-over-year peak in June 2023. Personal consumption expenditures rose 0.5% in September after a 0.3% increase in August. Real spending, adjusted to remove inflation, increased 0.4% in September, with spending on goods and services each climbing 0.5%. While spending increased more than personal income, the personal savings rate dipped to 4.6% in September, down from 4.8% in August and 4.9% in July. As inflation has almost eliminated compensation gains, people are dipping into savings to support spending. This will ultimately lead to a slowing of consumer spending. Discover more from Eye On Housing Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Despite expected Federal Reserve rate cuts for short-term interest rates, long-term rates have moved higher in recent weeks. In fact, since mid-September, the 10-year Treasury rate has increased a dramatic 70 basis points, rising this week to near 4.3% — the highest rate since July.
Approximately 27% of the national housing stock consists of multifamily homes—defined as residential buildings with multiple separate housing units within one structure. According to the 2023 American Community Survey 1-year estimates, these units range from small duplexes, triplexes, and quadplexes (2 to 4 units) to medium-sized buildings (5 to 49 units) and large complexes (50 or more units). While most congressional districts have multifamily housing shares between 10% to 20% of total housing units, this proportion varies widely, from as low as 8% to as high as 98%. The map below illustrates the distribution of multifamily housing stock across congressional districts with larger shares indicated by bigger bubble size. This visualization shows that districts with the largest share of multifamily units are, unsurprisingly, concentrated in densely populated urban areas. New York leads in this regard, with its 12th and 13th Districts – both encompassing upper and midtown Manhattan – having almost exclusively multifamily units at 98% each. In fact, eight out of the top 10 districts with the largest share of multifamily housing are in New York. Other areas with large shares include New Jersey’s 8th District, also within the New York metropolitan area, and Massachusetts’s 7th District that includes Boston. At the lower end of the distribution, North Carolina’s 8th District has only 8% multifamily units, while Michigan’s 2nd and 9th Districts, Arizona’s 9th District, and Florida’s 12th District all have around 9% multifamily units. Building Sizes in Multifamily Units In most congressional districts, multifamily units tend to be on the smaller side, with the majority consisting of buildings with 5 to 19 units, followed by those with 2 to 4 units. Duplexes, triplexes, and quadplexes (2 to 4 units) are especially common in the Northeast, various Mountain states, and parts of California. Apart from Illinois’s 4th District, which has the highest share of small multifamily units (70%), the remaining top five districts with the largest shares of 2 to 4 unit buildings are all in New York, each exceeding 60%. Buildings with 5 to 19 units are more prevalent across the South and Midwest, with Maryland’s 2nd, 3rd and 4th Districts owning majority shares of this building type with 59%, 62% and 61%, respectively. High-density areas like New York’s 12th District, Florida’s 27th District – located within Miami-Dade County – and Washington, D.C. (at large), tend to have the largest multifamily (50 or more) buildings. North Dakota (at large) and Minnesota’s 6th District stand out as the only two congressional districts where the majority of multifamily buildings have between 20 to 49 multifamily units. Gross Median Rent and Renter Cost Burden Multifamily units are predominantly rented rather than owned, with 86% being occupied by renters. This trend holds across all multifamily types, with larger buildings generally more likely to be rental properties, while condominiums (owner-occupied units) are often smaller buildings. A Fannie Mae study on the multifamily market found that larger properties typically command higher monthly rents, especially in major metropolitan areas. The chart below corroborates this, showing that districts with higher shares of large multifamily buildings (50 or more units) also have higher median monthly rents (including utilities and fuel). However, lower median rents don’t always equate to more affordability, as even low-rent areas can have high renter cost burdens due to lower income levels. For example, New York’s 12th District has the highest median rent at $3,121, with 43% of renters burdened (spending over 30% of income on housing costs), a rate matched by Kentucky’s 5th District, where the median rent is only $727. Overall, despite rent prices moderating (see Real Rent Index), rental cost burdens remain high across the country, with only 23 of 436 congressional districts (including D.C.) having fewer than 40% of renter households burdened by housing costs. Additional housing data for your congressional district are provided by the US Census Bureau here. Discover more from Eye On Housing Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
NAHB has information on where to vote and resources to help encourage members to vote.
Housing’s share of the economy fell 0.1 percentage points to 16.2% in the third quarter of 2024 according to the advance estimate of GDP produced by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. The share was revised upwards for both the first and second quarter of 2024 to 16.3%. The more cyclical home building and remodeling component – residential fixed investment (RFI) – was 4.0% of GDP, slightly lower than the 4.1% in the second quarter. RFI subtracted 21 basis points from the headline GDP growth rate in the third quarter of 2024, the second consecutive quarter where RFI negatively contributed to GDP growth. In the third quarter, housing services added 18 basis points (bps) to GDP growth while the share grew to 12.2% of GDP. Among household expenditures for services, housing services contributions were the third-highest contributor to headline GDP growth behind health care (30 bps) and food service and accommodations (19 bps), while above other services (12 bps) and transportation services (10 bps). The graph above stacks the nominal shares for housing services and RFI, resulting in housing’s total share of the economy. Overall GDP increased at a 2.8% annual rate, down from a 3.0% increase in the second quarter of 2024, but up from a 1.6% increase in the first quarter of 2024. Housing-related activities contribute to GDP in two basic ways: The first is through residential fixed investment (RFI). RFI is effectively the measure of home building, multifamily development, and remodeling contributions to GDP. RFI consists of two specific types of investment, the first is residential structures. This investment includes construction of new single-family and multifamily structures, residential remodeling, production of manufactured homes, brokers’ fees and some types of equipment that are built into the structure. RFI’s second component, residential equipment, includes investment such as furniture or household appliances that are purchased by landlords for rental to tenants. For the third quarter, RFI was 4.0% of the economy, recording a $1.175 trillion seasonally adjusted annual pace. RFI shrank 5.1% at an annual rate in the third quarter after falling 2.8% in the second. Among the two types of RFI, real investment in residential structures fell 5.3% while for residential equipment it rose 2.2%. Investment in residential structures stood at a seasonally adjusted annual pace of $1.153 trillion, making its share of residential investment far greater than that of residential equipment, which was at seasonally adjusted annual pace of $21.5 billion. The second impact of housing on GDP is the measure of housing services. Similar as we saw with RFI, housing services consumption can be broken out into two components. The first component, housing, includes gross rents paid by renters, owners’ imputed rent (an estimate of how much it would cost to rent owner-occupied units), rental value of farm dwellings and group housing. The inclusion of owners’ imputed rent is necessary from a national income accounting approach, because without this measure, increases in homeownership would result in declines in GDP. The second component, household utilities, is composed of consumption expenditures on water supply, sanitation, electricity, and gas. For the third quarter, housing services represented 12.2% of the economy or $3.581 trillion on a seasonally adjusted annual basis. Housing services grew 1.5% at an annual rate in the third quarter. Real personal consumption expenditures for housing grew 1.4% while household utilities expenditures grew 1.7%. At current dollar expenditure level, housing expenditures was $3.124 trillion and household utility expenditures stood at $456.6 billion in seasonally adjusted annual rates. Housing service growth is much less volatile when compared to RFI due to the cyclical nature of RFI. Historically, RFI has averaged roughly 5% of GDP while housing services have averaged between 12% and 13%, for a combined 17% to 18% of GDP. These shares tend to vary over the business cycle. However, the housing share of GDP lagged during the post-Great Recession period due to underbuilding, particularly for the single-family sector. Discover more from Eye On Housing Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
At the 2024 Fall Leadership Meeting, the NAHB Legal Action Committee recommended financial assistance through the Legal Action Fund for five cases, which the Board approved at its meeting.
The U.S. economy grew at a solid pace in the third quarter of 2023, boosted by strong consumer spending and government spending. According to the “advance” estimate released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), real gross domestic product (GDP) expanded at an annual rate of 2.8% in the third quarter of 2024, following a 3.0% gain in the second quarter of 2024. This quarter’s growth matched NAHB’s forecast. Furthermore, the data from the GDP report suggests that inflation is cooling. The GDP price index rose 1.8% for the third quarter, down from a 2.5% increase in the second quarter of 2024. The Personal Consumption Expenditures Price (PCE) Index, which measures inflation (or deflation) across various consumer expenses and reflects changes in consumer behavior, rose 1.5% in the third quarter. This is down from a 2.5% increase in the second quarter of 2024. This quarter’s increase in real GDP primarily reflected increases in consumer spending, exports, and federal government spending. Consumer spending, the backbone of the U.S. economy, rose at an annual rate of 3.7% in the third quarter. It marks the highest annual growth rate since the first quarter of 2023. The increase in consumer spending reflected increases in both goods and services. While goods spending increased at a 6.0% annual rate, expenditures for services increased 2.6% at an annual rate. The U.S. trade deficit increased in the third quarter, as imports increased more than exports. A wider trade deficit shaved 0.56 percentage points off GDP. Imports, which are a subtraction in the calculation of GDP, increased 11.2%, while exports rose 8.9%. In the third quarter, federal government spending increased 9.7%, led by a 14.9% surge in national defense outlays. Nonresidential fixed investment increased 3.3% in the third quarter. Increases in equipment and intellectual property products were partly offset by a decrease in structures. Meanwhile, residential fixed investment decreased 5.1% in the third quarter and dragged down the contribution to real GDP by 0.21 percentage points. Within residential fixed investment, single-family structures declined 16.1% at an annual rate, multifamily structures decreased 8.7%, while improvements rose 13.9%. For the common BEA terms and definitions, please access bea.gov/Help/Glossary. Discover more from Eye On Housing Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.